Strategy
Accessibility programme strategy and consulting
Remediation fixes the artefacts you have. A programme changes what you produce next. Organisations that only remediate find themselves paying for the same audit every year.
Where the cost actually sits
An accessibility barrier costs least when it is caught in a design review and most when it is found by a user or a regulator after release. Each stage a defect survives adds cost: a design change becomes a code change, then a QA cycle, then a release, then a remediation project with a deadline attached.
The practical implication is that the highest-return work is rarely another audit. It is fixing the templates, components and review steps that keep generating the same findings.
What we look at
How content is authored and by whom. Whether the design system encodes accessible defaults or leaves them to individual judgement. Where accessibility appears in the definition of done. What your contracts require of suppliers. How conformance is evidenced when a buyer asks.
What you get
A written assessment, a target standard your organisation has actually agreed to, and a staged roadmap with named owners — not a maturity score with no next action.
Related
Other things we do
NIMAS XML production from print books
Validated NIMAS filesets built from your print PDFs, with alt text authored and the title carried through to NIMAC certification.
PDF/UAAccessible PDF remediation to PDF/UA
Tag trees, reading order, table headers and metadata remediated to PDF/UA (ISO 14289), delivered with a conformance report.
DocumentsRemediation of Word, PowerPoint, Excel and EPUB
The other formats your organisation publishes — brought up to standard so the same content works for every reader.
Send us a title and a deadline
Tell us the format you have and the format you need. We will tell you plainly whether the source converts cleanly, and what it takes.